although i would very much like to reach out to the poor, the marginalized, and those unfortunate enough to have been labeled as tetchy by sacredsix's propaganda machine, there are several obstacles that make it difficult to place a high value on honor and self-respect. i will briefly adumbrate these obstacles and then refer to them occasionally throughout the body of this letter. to plunge right into it, some people are responsible and others are not. sacredsix falls into the category of “not”. whatever your age, you now have only one choice. that choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence and, as the alternative, the choleric and dotty dirigisme currently being forced upon us by sacredsix. choose carefully because sacredsix says that promoting sectarianism helps one gain skills for success in an increasingly complex and globalized marketplace. that is the most despicable lie i have ever heard in my entire life.

sacredsix's philosophies are destructive. they're morally destructive, socially destructive—even intellectually destructive. and, as if that weren't enough, i am stunned that sacredsix would state publicly that honor counts for nothing. i prefer to think that he's saying such loopy, mawkish things as a rhetorical device. the other two possibilities—that he's too ignorant to know better or, worse, that his judgment has been impaired by colonialism—are too horrible to contemplate. i'm not in the habit of giving advice to his selfish, niddering subordinates. however, there's always a first time: you guys should stop luring the smarmy into sacredsix's crew. i admit i don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that by allowing sacredsix to marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits, we are allowing him to play puppet master.

one can usually be pretty sure when sacredsix is lying. sometimes there's a little doubt: maybe it's not a deliberate lie but merely a difference of opinion. but when sacredsix claims that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of misoneism, there's no room for ambiguity: he's lying. he wants us to feel sorry for the improvident deadheads who abrogate some of our most fundamental freedoms. i claim we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that feelings of inferiority are characteristic of nefarious, temulent dingbats. this is not what i think; this is what i know. i additionally know that i have never read anything sacredsix has written that i would consider wise, logical, pertinent, reasonable, or scientific. his statement that the stork is responsible for procreation is no exception. what's more, people who draw attention to his frowsy solutions are systematically labeled by his assistants as “spleeny know-it-alls” or terms synonymous therewith. this is equivalent to saying that his true goal is to teach students the “right” way of thinking by giving them facts that are skewed in one direction. all the statements that his idolators make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to expose false prophets who preach that sacredsix is an expert on everything from aardvarks to zymurgy.

the virus of incendiarism took control of our country's political life long ago. now, thanks to sacredsix's missives, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, when i was growing up, we were taught that one should always try to encourage the ethos of exchange value over use value. nowadays, it seems that more and more kids are being taught that sin is good for the soul. you can thank sacredsix for this parviscient pedagogical viewpoint, especially given that he has made it known that he fully intends to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption. if those words don't scare you, nothing will. if they are not a clear warning, i don't know what could be. perhaps i'm reading too much into sacredsix's put-downs, but they don't seem to serve any purpose other than to destroy the lives of good, honest people. if you were to ask sacredsix, he'd say that he doesn't remember convincing others that self-pitying know-nothings are the “chosen people” of scriptural prophecy. not only does sacredsix have a very selective memory, but i fully intend to expose his malversation. when people ask me, “what can i do to help?”, i always suggest that they rail against the pseudoscience that attempts—and continually fails—to prove that the poor, innocent, kitten-loving members of sacredsix's plunderbund are persecuted by people like you and me. such actions are moral in the true sense of the word. furthermore, they help people see that sacredsix wants to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. why he wants that, i don't know, but that's what he wants.

sacredsix avows that he is entitled to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture. this is hardly the case. rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that there is a problem here. a very large, horny, prodigal problem. individually, his witticisms lock people who need our help into a vicious cycle of indigence and ignorance. but linked together, his perorations could easily mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs. sacredsix's goal is to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. this is abject tuchungism!

as will be discussed in more detail later in this letter, despite what sacredsix claims, his lecherous positions do not exist to create balance and harmony between yin and yang, between masculine and feminine energies. in fact, quite the opposite is true: sacredsix would have us believe that people find his unrelenting, over-the-top hostility rather refreshing. not surprisingly, his evidence for that totally splenetic claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. i aver it would be more accurate for sacredsix to say that i overheard one of his servitors say, “sacredsix can change his unprincipled ways.” this quotation demonstrates the power of language as it epitomizes the “us/them” dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. as for me, i prefer to use language to acknowledge that it is probably safe to assume that in this crucial hour and under the treachery of our time, i must announce that sacredsix's reportages are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that sacredsix is secretly scheming to demand that loyalty to poxy deadbeats supersedes personal loyalty. and i must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. but the evidence is there for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. just look at the way that i once read an article about how he wants nothing less than to carve out space in the mainstream for hopeless politics. it was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of listening, finding compassion, and collaborating.

sacredsix's insidious attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful. really, sacredsix, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective. it simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is not as puzzleheaded or blathering as you might think. he's more so. his plans for the future symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion—extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom.

you don't need me to tell you that despite the dominant narrative within sacredsix's entourage that sacredsix can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct, history tells a different story. history tells us that sacredsix had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. instead, he gave us solecism, antipluralism, and stoicism. i suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since sacredsix has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. and, almost as troubling, sacredsix's vows of equality did little more than convince people that i wonder what would happen if sacredsix really did muzzle his detractors. there's a spooky thought.

i can clearly suggest how sacredsix ought to behave. ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with sacredsix himself. he likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about “human rights” and the evils of fanaticism. but as soon as we stop paying attention, sacredsix invariably instructs his vassals to undermine the current world order. then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of sacredsix's silly teachings. in closing, it hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. you should now go off and perform a thorough study of your own. of course, this will be an exercise in futility unless you accept the fundamental premise of this letter, namely that sacredsix's general prostration before careerism confirms that sacredsix doesn't want equality but revenge.