You keep conveniently ignoring the fact that THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT MAKE NO CLAIM WHATSOEVER THAT THE CAR MADE CONTACT.

Sorry for the all caps, but you're so fucking dense that it just doesn't seem to be getting through. I guarantee you that if they had touched that car, they'd be slathering HIT AND RUN, HIT AND RUN all over the headline, details and in-video captions.

As it stands, the video is potato quality and the fact that you think it's absolutely, 100% clear that they made contact and that there is no possibility that it's just perspective and potato-quality video fucking with your feeble brain means you're an assuming idiot.

It doesn't take a lawyer to not be an utter retard, which you are being by proclaiming yourself somehow more intelligent than I am simply because you believe that they made contact while I do not, only I'm basing my assumptions not only off the video itself (because it sure doesn't look like they make contact to me - close, but no cigar. That's bike parts scattering all over the road, not a "piece of his helmet") but off the fact that NOBODY INVOLVED is making the claim that contact was made.

You're basing your claim purely off a video which is by no means conclusive on its own due to the angle and quality, yet I'm the one who is not smart?

Sorry, but you're the stupid one here.