The post you're replying to said their critique of the releases was that they were tailored for a pro-Putin agenda, not that they were untrue. I don't know much of anything about Julian Assange and while I support releasing documents showing corruption of world leaders, I also oppose the agendas of corrupt world leaders (like Putin) so if it's the case that Assange was opposing corrupt world leaders to further the agenda of a corrupt world leader, well I'll say thanks for doing your part but screw you too. And as to the person's point you're responding to, unlike them, I do realize that a lot of other media sources also tailor the release of their news to fit their agenda (FOX, CNN, MSNBC) but that doesn't mean it's ok that Wikileaks was doing it as well, even if it resulted in something good for a candidate you liked (or something bad for one you didn't).