It's mindblowing you conflate me referring to the far right, which is an actual thing and measurable on a belief scale

Referring to people as 'Far right' is not 'grouping' people together

I've literally already commented on this and my comment covers what you have written here very well.

You are inside your own head creating a filter of people by whether you attribute this label to them - "dogmatic to the point of being irrational in having extreme right wing views" - and grouping them together.

It does not matter whether you think that we can use a test to do this. We can use a test to classify anyone together. We can use a test that asks "do you wear the burqa?" and group them together as burqa-wearers or not. We can use a test that asks "do you believe in Islam?" and group people together based on whether they believe in Islam or not.

What characterises the dimension you are grouping people on whilst simultaneously insisting that you are not grouping - "far right" - is that it's an extremely vague and diffuse category. Are nationalistic socialists who oppose immigration but want a strong state and welfare within their country far right? Are libertarians who want no state far right? Unlike "muslims" and "burqa-wearers", the grouping which you insist is not a grouping is actually one of the worse groupings you can undertake.

you can label someone who has dogmatic beliefs, as being that certain thing.

Ironically, the certainty you express in this is in itself dogmatic. You are simultaneously insisting that we should be able to group people together on this dimension (which as I point out ironically include yourself) whilst insisting that you are not grouping anyone together per the above quote.

Asshole is an insult, dickhead is an insult, irrational is a behaviour.

Irrational is also an insult. Dickhead also describes behavior. "He's being a dickhead" = describes behavior.

Bold does not make you 'more' right.

Writing platitudes to refute false beliefs about what I have written I is not proof that you have ever finished grade school.

You've proven nothing except that you think classifications of beliefs cannot exist

No, I haven't. I have pointed out that the paradoxical insanity that you simultaneously intensely want to group people whilst intensely refusing that you are grouping people.

a quick look at your comment history shows you have a terrible superiority complex so I can already tell replying to you is only going to end in frustration.

A quick look at your comments show that you are making insane, indefensible and paradoxical claims. My comment history should show that I don't respond with criticism unless it's justified.

Please, please stop acting like you're even remotely philosophical with your observations, they are anything but.

You appear to be acting like a great judge of this.