People keep saying dailynk is untrustworthy, but wouldn't the onus be on the skeptics to prove that a newspaper is putting out wrong information? People keep claiming that the reason dailynk is untrustworthy is because they lied about the kim is dead rumors, but they literally claimed they were only rumors the whole time. People are acting like they straight up said he was dead when that isn't the case.

The rumors started because 1, he disappeared from the public for weeks after missing some big family memorial event, and 2, a video claiming he was dead spread like wildfire around the country, both of which are completely true. So which story is false? I went through and these are the stories from back then:

https://www.dailynk.com/english/video-claiming-kim-jong-uns-death-spreads-north-korea/

https://www.dailynk.com/english/pyongyang-cadres-worried-about-kim-jong-uns-health/

https://www.dailynk.com/english/n-korean-authorities-refrain-squashing-kju-death-rumors/

https://www.dailynk.com/english/what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-about-kim-jong-uns-absence/

Is it dailynk's fault that other newspapers ran with these and started claiming he actually was dead? Their job is to report the news and the video would cause pretty large waves to call for exactly that. Reddit hates misinformation but seems to be spreading exactly that by claiming dailynk is untrustworthy. If anyone has any hard proof the dailynk is putting out inconsistent stories I'd genuinely love to see them.