I like how you completely chose the "society wide trends" point.

First ten posts as of right now and you're one for ten.

No actually its 10 for 10. None of these profiles would work for men. Half the sub is women looking for men to provide for their kids and the other half is making ludicrus demands because they know they're gonna get them.

How could anyone think you're misogynist?

https://fullfact.org/economy/are-women-paying-60-less-income-tax-men/

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mm.dk%2Fartikel%2Fkvinder-er-en-underskudsforretning

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926

Convinient how you keep ignoring the studies that go along with that comment innit?

Quality over quantity. Despite all these words, you haven't made an adequate case.

https://fullfact.org/economy/are-women-paying-60-less-income-tax-men/

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mm.dk%2Fartikel%2Fkvinder-er-en-underskudsforretning

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap

https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222673203_Sex_Differences_in_Human_Neonatal_Social_Perception

https://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/5b1501/F/sex.pdf