I posted this question elsewhere but it was deleted because of the thread didn't follow the rules. It seems to me hundreds of thousands can sway her. But I'm not sure I'm understanding it correctly:

Here's a question I'd like to ask:

Here's a question I'd like to ask:

Back in 2002 Hillary was against incentives for ethanol stating:

“If the average American consumer tunes in on this debate and realizes what is happening, there will be a revolt. I dare predict that voting for this bill, which will raise gas prices in 45 of our States, will be a political nightmare for people who end up voting for it. Higher gas prices at the pump, reduced Federal assistance for much-needed transportation projects, possible negative air quality, and public health impacts, to say nothing of raiding the Federal Treasury to give this giveaway to these large producers, makes it impossible to understand why any pro-consumer, pro-health, pro-environment, anti-government mandate Member of this body would vote for this provision.”

Then right before running for president you have her supporting it after receiving large donations from potential donors in the industry:

One potential beneficiary is the Yucaipa Companies, a private equity firm where Mr. Clinton has been a senior adviser and whose founder, Mr. Burkle, has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Mrs. Clinton’s campaigns. Yucaipa has invested millions in Cilion Inc. — a start-up venture also backed by Mr. Branson, the British entrepreneur, and Mr. Khosla, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist — that is building seven ethanol plants around the country. Two are in upstate New York.

Am I misunderstanding or did she completely change her mind once money started to show up for her? I'm not really decided on the election yet. But I'm very interested in this topic and how money plays a role in our politicians decisions. She has stated that these donations do not affect her decision making. From what I can tell it really did in this situation.