OK, I see, you raise points, I answer them and instead of keeping on track with that you never answer to what I say and change the subject. If you keep doing that, I'm not going to answer any further.
Now, you jump to conclusions a lot and assert them without argument, that's not very nice.
1) I never said that she wasn't going listen any advice, where did you read that? I was parodying what she wrote, and you can tell. Quote me, please.
2) Eh? That not even a point, just more name calling and insults. Boring. It didn't "shift" anything to you, when you posted the OP already said that she was being manipulative (my point). Anyway, most of this point is barely intelligible.
3) I understand and I said clearly she was not interested on keep a relation with him, but to manipulate him in order to her needs. YOU merely repeated what she said, without inferring her real intention. Let's put in another way: you was going to tell her exactly what she wanted to hear. Yes, you can disagree with me and say I wasn't right, that she wanted to stay friends with the guy (falsified by the OP herself), but that's wholly different from confusing the "core" of her problem or whatever.
4) Again, name calling, is getting boring. If I perceive something as simple and other person perceive something as difficult, that doesn't mean I'm wrong and she is right, or viceversa. I never said that her problem was simple merely because I was seeing as simple. And remember: all the simple vs difficult diatribe was because you confused emotions with our interpretation of them. You, cowardly, are changing the subject to "relationships" without answering the points I raised in my previous post. Typical.
5) Lol, it seems you don't know what cognitive evaluable means. Do yourself a service and google it. I already addressed your concerns about "tact" and niceness and whatever. My post was not disrespectful, just blunt and honest. You seem prone to confuse nice (or, let's say, hypocresy) with respect.
And then, you confuse semantics with arguments and claim some "experience of navigation relationships", putting in my mouth claims I never made about marriage or "emotional baggage". No. You don't justify your claims with your mysterious capacity of navigation, but with arguments. If you were only confused about the meaning of words (that is, the province of semantics), I'd let it pass because you seem not very intelligent. But you're deluded about concepts, and prone to make categorical mistakes. If you don't perceive that thinking clearly is important to interpret our feelings, so be it. But put it clearly and don't pretend you're addressing my answers to your concerns about my posts, because you are not. You're merely claiming "OH YOUR SO STUPID AND IMMATURE, NAVIGATING THE WORLD OF EMOTIONS IS SO COMPLEX LOL".
By the way, I repeat. For someone so clever in being tactful and such, you're surprisingly prone to use insults and name calling. Besides, is really hard to tell what is your point beneath all those florid words.
If you want to debate the role of emotions in our cognition and the complexities of relationships, let's do it. But at least leave your insults and try to engage me clearly, with arguments.