These alt-right guys are purposefully going into liberal areas to cause problems and incite violence. It's their gameplan.

So, because the Left can't behave itself to the point that coming to a building and speaking is enough to incite them to violence, the Right is at fault. This strikes me as a certain flavor of blaming.

Then he shouldn't go around hanging out with white supremacists making Nazi salutes.

I don't see how this makes him harmful? I think it compounds my assertion that he's just a fucking idiot.

Nationalist and Right Wing terrorists are the second deadliest group of terrorists by ideology and account for 219 murders and 6.6 percent of all terrorist deaths. Left Wing terrorists killed only 23 people in terrorist attacks during this time.

Okay, we're having a discussion about the current climate of general politics, not the actions of fringe elements that exist beyond the conventional political spectrum over the last quarter of a century. You don't have to tell me that radical separatist militias in the woods and actual supremacists/conspiracy theorists are generally more deadly than anarchists and communists, but that's not what we are discussing.

Berkley is one of the few incidents people can point at and that was on situation where there really was violence on both sides, but people only talk about the left. Most of the other calls to violence or attacks have turned out to be alt-right false flags and hoaxes.

I see what you are saying here, but we are talking about things that have happened. And I don't see how any honest observer could not say that it is the Left that has overwhelmingly been confronting the Right. Frankly, without the examples of actual violence, where would these alt-right fraudsters have come up with the idea? They didn't twist the narrative, they hopped onto it.