So I'm pretty in the middle open to both regulation arguments and why not to . But do you people here view regulations as a slippery slope because you believe once say idk example full automatic weapons ban to you think that will eventually lead to a full weapons ban ? Because we've had automatic weapons banned so why is it the thought of banning bump stocks limiting magazines and banned assault rifles too far ? Like I don't quite understand really trying here can someone enlighten me ? Or if you have any historic evidence too of a democratic nation slowly taking away all guns and I mean all not still allowing hunting rifles and handguns and a few other guns. Like does someone have a good principled argument and if possible historic examples ? Pretty please lol I feel like this community would be the most informed