No exploitation pls

1: As I said in another comment the worker does not set the price, why not? Why is the price of the bread and the cost to make it both determined by the organisation selling it?

2: Yes, congratulations, this is a metaphor, a literal interpretation isn't the best idea.

3: >Your work value is not worth 1/3rd of the product you create.

Who says so? What's the exact value of my labour? This ties back into the fact that wage negotiations are inherently coercive, a business can go a lot longer without labour than labour can go without pay and they will absolutely leverage this fact to pay as little as possible.

4: >If I assemble Lamborghinis, I don’t think I deserve $400,000. If truly I deserved $400000 why can’t I get $400000?

Is this not a critique of capitalism? A Lamborghini's constituent parts are not worth $400,000, probably not even a quarter of that in fact. If labour doesn't bring the cost up that high then what does? Oh, that's right, corporate owners inflating prices of goods they didn't have any influence on in order to line their pockets.

5: >Does not mean I therefore should own a part of those things.

Why not? It wouldn't exist without you just as it would not have existed without someone to buy the parts and tools to make it, again three parts, why is the owner allowed to take the third that I instilled?

/r/Libertarian Thread Parent Link - imgur.com