To my knowledge the NRA has never expressed shame for its past nor attempted restitutions, like assisting in arming black community groups just to give an idea what that might look like

You mean things like this.

It seems that "to your knowledge", means, "I haven't researched this at all and would rather just hate people than try to understand them.

BTW, the facts of the Castile case are that he was high at the time and possessed the cannabis. This is not from a toxicology report, but from his girlfriend. This doesn't in anyway justify the actions of Yanez or the court system, but it's a good thing when we keep our conversation to the truth.

Oh, and I've already said elsewhere that I think the NRA's silence on this is wrong, but consistent with their stance of not supporting people illegally carrying.

Of course, it's also been less than a day since the verdict, so maybe waiting for them to respond may be in order, though I doubt they will.

Now, can you tell me why you're accosting me about the NRA, when I didn't bring them up? I believe that I said stuff about the 2nd Amendment above, not the NRA.