So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.So a female just has to be "coerced" enough to get sloppy drunk enough to pass out with their clothes off. Notice the story also mention females posing for the camera with their clothes off. I mean, couldn't be possible that some of these women also partook in the picture taking incident? But no, the implication based on nothing but conjecture, is that these boys coerced these innocent females and forced their participation in taking their clothes off. No, this is a just a stereotypical witch-hunt to demonize men while propping up the error-filled maxim that women have no agency.