OJ Simpson isn't relevant to this, this isn't refuting my argument, here's the bottom line, the evidence cleared this guy, meaning he isn't guilty by law, your opinion doesn't change this.
No, it means he was acquitted of the charge. I encourage you to read things outside the internet bubble where you get your information. The reference to OJ Simpson is called an Example, a commonly used thing in discussions in the real world, and is absolutely relevant.
Nothing I've said has ANYTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING A WOMAN, you're the reason people make fun of feminists, I want you to know that.
I've never said I'm a feminist, so, someone disagreeing with you on the internet means all feminists are X? Again, the stereotyping you do is really just a shining beacon of those critical thinking skills you think you have.
I also want you to copy paste which rule I broke, I'll be waiting, you can't crybully and get what you want pal, but knock yourself out trying.
The sidebar is right there >> but if you don't want to remove the slur we can have the mods decide, I'm not overly concerned.
First of all, that's exactly what you'd do, if you threaten to cry rape unless you're paid x, and the victim refuses you take it to trial, then file a civil suit after, you really don't seem to have very good critical thinking ability.
No, this never happens. Calling your feelings "critical thinking ability" is not helping your case. Extortion is illegal. By your own logic, if she had commited extorition, she would have been found guilty of extortion, right? Because if a court doesn't find you guilty of something, you didn't do it. So which is it?
And again, he presented EVIDENCE IN PRIVATE that cleared him, meaning he has something clearing him, that's the bottom line here, and the court system agrees with me
No, he presented evidence in private that raised a reasonable doubt. I really very much encourage you to read about how the criminal justice system works, since you're clearly very misinformed. All it takes to be acquitted of every crime ever is to raise a reasonable doubt in the mind of the judge or jury. You're making wild guesses based on what you want to be true because it fits your narrative that your internet friends told you about how women allegedly lie about rape all the time, despite the fact that, yknow, facts and evidence show that that's not remotely true.
The court system doesn't agree with you, again, you should read about it (in a book, not an MRA subreddit full of angry teenagers). Look up the standard of proof in criminal cases and its effects on sexual assault prosecutions. From a book. Written by someone who knows something and didn't write it surrounded by empty Code Red cans in his mom's basement.
You're spewing tumblr level mental gymnastics, you are the definition of tumblr, do you even read what you type? you also have no idea how to form a real argument, you seem like some naive teenager with no idea how the legal system works.
LOL, my J.D. would disagree with you kid, but you're adorable. Please, tell me how I'm the "definition of a blogging website", you darling "critical thinker" you.