blah blah blah blah blah.
all completely irrelevant to my point. You completely missed the point, non-sequitor, etc.
2 nope, missed the point. The entire question is, is it harder for America to afford something like this because we have more people? the answer I gave was a detailed and resounding no. it's really quite obvious, but people like to give this fool hardy "herpaderp but we have moar people" answer as if it's actually relevant to the topic all the time on reddit when it isnt and I'm sick of it.
4 Let's pretend I had made that argument, yanno, because I hate myself ad love being covered in shit. Even if I had, you've done a real shit job of making a counter post. That's just not how taxes work. I get taxed for shit I am morally opposed to or do not benefit from all the God damn time. hell, probably most of my taxes fall into those categories. Do you see me whining about it constantly? no. Because taxation needs to work this way. If we let people get all nitpicky about paying only for what they feel benefits them our government would become a shambles. Paying for something that needs doing, but benefits half or less than half of the population is exactly how our taxes work right now and that's fine.
fuck if I know if it should be done, but we could do it easier than most places in Europe which was all I fucking said to begin with, and it would be a reasonable expense under what we currently accept as taxable.
Ps. fuck you, you ginormous cunt.