I know what the "male gaze" is. It's largely been discredited in feminist circles.

See https://wgsintersections.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/sider-jennifer-beyond-the-male-gaze.pdf for an example.

It's an incredibly controversial psychoanalytic theory in the vein of feminism that thinks pornography is incredibly harmful. I don't. If there are any issues at all with sexual imagery, it is certainly cultural, rather than gender-related, because gender is a cultural phenomenon. Everything it is to be a man or a woman is dictated by one's culture, save the biological differences in sex (not gender). Focusing on the gender, rather than the culture, leads to inane lines of thought like "How is this seen and framed by men?" rather than "what are the consequences of this depiction."

There is a theoretical difference between sex-negativity and sex-moralism, but in practice they are largely indistinguishable. It rarely has a problem with male or LGBT sexuality, but when it comes to heterosexual female sexuality, it completely loses its shit.

Now, I am impressed that you found an encyclopedia of gender feminist terms. Now maybe you should set about looking for an empirical (real world, existing) connection between depictions of female sexuality and negative consequences. I'm sure you haven't, because no one has. They, like you, think inventing jargon is an equally informative academic exercise, when in reality all it does is provide a more "sophisticated" language with which to support a pre-determined narrative. It's people like you that hate on Bayonetta instead of celebrating a strong and confident female MC that the industry desperately needs more of. I don't care about the effects of your intellectual vacuity on men. It concerns me that you are using feminism to hurt and infantilize women and shame their sexuality.

It's been