Funny how an article arguing in favor of the undeniable falsifiability of its beliefs makes no falsifiable claims. And while some of the events in the new testament were shown to have come to pass, which is true of the old testament as well (lets not kid, the old testament gives a pretty detailed description of the tribes of Israel), there is no causal relationship between the events in either testament or the repurposed teachings of the faith itself. At least Buddhism reasons why it comes to the conclusions that it does. The contents of the bible are dictated. You accept them at face value, and don't question them or face fear of death or eternal damnation.

And then the repurposed teachings, which make sense to most people, are mixed in with garbage like this; "the evidence of our Creator’s hand is in everything and always has been." This is propaganda. Its not reasoned, there's no reason to make a statement like this, and certainly no evidence to even wonder whether a god created anything. Its clear what god is in these texts. A place holder ready to be filled by any priest or president willing to assume the position. An undeniable, absolute leader that is to be blindly obeyed and not questioned. Population control.

These texts don't teach people to make valid conclusions about their environment, they don't teach people how to solve interpersonal conflict. They've made a business out of keeping people in a false state of security and condition them not to ask questions because too much knowledge exposes the obvious fallacies of the cult. If the belief system were valid, it would be able to stand up to questioning and be reasoned. The real truth about how life emerged and evolved is all around us, not in some unchanging books written by violent jihadists from the stone age. And all of us must question our environment and our community in order to understand it and in order to reach the compromises that are necessary for us to coexist. There is no higher power that makes those decisions for us. And asserting ones false sense of moral superiority as proof of the existence of a god only illustrates the emotional need for a god and exposes the complete absence of evidence in support of it.