It's actually pretty simple to proof your cover art, you've exaggerated that point beyond logic, so might want to take your own advice. It's also not useful to take leaps of logic that are clearly not the case, even if you suffix it with "probably not", ok then don't mention it?

There isn't malicious intent behind it now because you're arguing in hindsight. Publishers don't have our trust where a misprint doesn't get questioned because that foundation was never built, the foundation we have is that publishers want to screw you.

A more reputable company may have been given the chance to explain, WB doesn't have that reputation. That is their fault, not the consumers.

Discussion on Reddit is broad, like this discussion right now. It is what you make it, if you want to focus on the hate groups, then all you will see is hate groups. It's like that old trick, "Count how many green cars you see tomorrow while driving", it seems like you don't see many green cars, then tomorrow will you count more green cars than you ever thought existed. The same goes for rational discussion on Reddit.