Your reliance on shouting "straw-man" doesn't make your argument any more valid.

Well you certainly haven't been able to invalidate it, and the straw men don't exactly help your case.

Many more men have partners, if not wives, than you want to admit.

When did I make any claim about it, other than that 70% of men ages 20-34 are unmarried?

The Kinsley Institute shows that men and women have pretty much equal statistics when it comes to when they have sex. There is a 3% difference between men and women at age 22-24. If it is so difficult for men to find sexual partners, why is that the case?

So, there you go, you post a source but you only focus on one part of a two piece issue. I said it's harder for women to find someone good enough, isn't that reflected in the fact that they're pickier with who they have sex with?

You keep coming up with crap arguments here, and misrepresenting my argument. Here's my argument: For men it's a struggle to find someone, for women it's a struggle to find someone good enough. Men on average have fewer options than women on average. And, on average, women have higher standards than men do in a partner.

You haven't refuted that. Your marriage stat doesn't refute that, your Kinsley stat doesn't refute that, none of anything you've posted refutes it, at all.

So far all you've brought to the table are: misleadingly presented stats, straw man arguments (ie, I say "it's harder for" you take it and change it to "impossible"), and personal commentary about how I'm "bitter" and bla bla bla, nonsense that isn't even relevant to what the argument is about.

Demonize half the population because you can't get laid. Blame feminism.

Where did I demonize women? Or even blame this on anyone?

Get attention by arguing with women on the internet about your misfortune.

I figured you were a chick, since you tried to do that whole cunty "psychological warfare", make it personal and call him "bitter" nonsense.

See how many relationships that gets you.

Who says I want any?