Don't think I'm BP in the sense you mean, but here is a possibly unsolicited comment on what you wrote:

Another thing I have noticed is the vehement rejection of simple things. I have cousins who have hit this boat, I am from an Indian family, and many of my cousins have high profile careers which they worked their butt off to get. Now they are looking for husband material in their 30s and are having a difficult time. TRP would have seen this from a mile away, and warn them what their career choices entail. While blue pillers would tell them 'men like smart women', 'most men don't care for youth and fertility, those that do are creepy twerpers you don't want to be with.' Now my cousins are in a position where they have straight up been lied to by blue pillers.

Do you need TRP to look up statistics about marriage (things like average age of first marriage, median age of first marriage, % of people of a given age who are married etc.)?

As time goes on more and more "husband material" men of a given age group marry and remove themselves from the pool of potential husbands in that age group. If a woman waits too long, she might find that most "husband material" men in the age group she is interested in are already married.

The only way to circumvent this would be for the woman to marry a significantly younger man. According to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_disparity_in_sexual_relationships in the US marriages where the woman is much older than the man are relatively rare.

Now a woman who wouldn't mind marrying a much younger man could tell herself that this is all due to women not wanting to marry younger men, and I suppose you could argue that TRP would tell her otherwise. But do you really need TRP to conclude that men generally will not want to marry a much older woman?

If you want to be scientific: Occam's razor.

So what sorts of predictions about people's relationships has TRP allowed you to make? Could they have been made with fewer assumptions?