Why do you think, if all milk produced by hormones were safe- don't you think- they would give hormones to stimulate breastfeeding in women that adopt an infant? They don't because it is not safe for the infant.

They don't because it's difficult for the mother and doesn't produce that much milk. I looked for research on the quality of that milk and found one study where they found that 10 days in the milk was very similar (women using the protocol don't produce colostrum, so they compared later on).

If you have sources showing that the milk is not safe for an infant then I would be interested to see it. I'm not at all interested in defending this guy, I'm just trying to see this from a scientific point of view (I do have a biology degree) and all the medical sources I've found (I'm ignoring random blogs) seem to think it's safe for the baby for adoptive mothers to do this, and while of course a male body is different in many ways the hormone-enhanced mammary glands would be pretty similar.

This is a sexual fantasy where a child is being used as a prop by the man. He doesn't care if the baby gets sick, and that signifies this is indeed a man that gets what ever sex he demands in that house. It is selfish for a man to force his child to participate in his fantasy

I completely agree! I find this completely horrible and repulsive.