• ⁠"He did find multiple cases where the president did behave in a manner that was unusual and obstructed justice, but had no standing to indict him"...again, sounds like not guilty to me.

Not being charged with a crime does not equate to not having committed a crime. From Mueller’s own words on the topic, he was UNABLE to charge the crime even if he found evidence of a crime:

MUELLER:
Because the OLC opinion -- the OLC opinion, Office of Legal Counsel, indicates that we cannot indict a sitting president. So one of the tools that a prosecutor would use is not there.

So no. Not “not guilty” but instead “beyond the ability of the Special Prosecutor to indict”.